Author Archives: Kent Sterling

Philip Rivers, Frank Reich, and Chris Ballard are NOT sexy, so ESPN, Fox, and CBS ignore Colts

Philip Rivers is not going to kick Patrick Mahomes, Deshawn Watson, or Lamar Jackson out of the “A Block” on ESPN’s Sportscenter.

Sexy is a word that does not and will not apply to the Indianapolis Colts, and so we don’t see a lot of Horseshoes on ESPN, Fox Sports, and CBS Sports.

What America saw last night from Ravens quarterback Lamar Jackson was sexy.  He ran all over the field, winning the game with his feet and arm.  He went into the locker room with a digestive issue, and emerged when his backup suffered an injury.  Jackson’t first play back – a touchdown pass.  See?  Sexy!

Colts quarterback Philip Rivers is not sexy.  Everything about him is ordinary, other than his brain and accuracy.  He drives his kids to school, moves like a guy with a broken foot when healthy, and can’t break a pane of glass slinging the ball as hard as he can.  Now that he actually has a broken foot, there has been no noticeable decline in speed.

That’s not to say Rivers is not valuable to a team headed to the playoffs; he’s just not sexy.

Frank Reich is not a sexy coach.  He isn’t entertaining with the media, never shines a light upon himself, and has only popped on social media for teaching his granddaughter how to secure a football with her “eagle claw.”  He is such a non-sexy coach that he didn’t make GM Chris Ballard’s list of five finalists when Josh McDaniels was hired into the job Reich would accept a few weeks later as McDaniels backed out.

That’s not to say Reich isn’t an effective coach; he just isn’t sexy.

Defensive coordinator Matt Eberflus is so unsexy that fans want him fired after every loss – or painful to watch first half when the Colts defense digs itself a hole.  His schemes can tend toward the simplistic.  He’s not Buddy Ryan, Monte Kiffin, Dick LeBeau, or Gregg Williams.  Eberflus is a relentless taskmaster who demands maximum effort each play from each player and requires perfection in tackling.

That’s not to say Eberflus isn’t an effective coordinator, but he certainly isn’t sexy.

The entirety of the Colts roster is not sexy.  They are diligent, intelligent, and trustworthy.  Good citizens all.  They support each other without selfishness, and never turn into divas. They have far less interest in social media scores and marketability than playing winning football.  In this era, the construct of the Colts is remarkable, but not sexy.  If the NFL had a model UN competition, the Colts would stack trophies like cord wood.

That roster is fast and capable, but not sexy.

Colts general manager Chris Ballard is not sexy.  Colts drafts under Ballard have re-built the roster as proficient and predictable.  As anyone who walks past his suite on the media level of the press box to get food or a beverage can tell you, Ballard gets angry during games, but he isn’t sexy.  The only moment that rang untrue and awkward since Ballard arrived in 2017 was when he tried to be quotable with his infamous, “The rivalry is back on” comment after McDaniels pivoted back to the Patriots after accepting the offer to become head coach.

Ballard tried that one time to be sexy, but it didn’t work.

Indianapolis isn’t sexy.  It’s nice, friendly, welcoming, and efficient, but not sexy like Miami, Los Angeles, or New York City.  People in Indy are very cool with that.  We treat athletes like ordinary folks, and so ordinary folks who happen to be athletes enjoy it here.  Athletes like Paul George who covet adulation don’t vibe with Indy and they tend to bounce to towns where they can be fawned over.  This is a fawning free zone.

Indy is very secure with its image (and reality) of not being a sexy city, which should be sexy, but isn’t.

If you want to know why national networks spend very little time talking about the Colts and Pacers, it’s because sexy sells – in places other than Indianapolis.  Here, we like winning, honesty, and effort by bland people we would never bother.

Bucket Game canceled – Hoosiers finish regular season 6-1

If you are jonesing for a Bucket Game, I’m afraid this is all that will be available Friday night!

It figures.

The re-scheduled Old Oaken Bucket game between Indiana and Purdue has been canceled.  That’s par for the course during a 2020 when everything in our lives has been tentative due to concerns about the spread of COVID-19.

The Hoosiers finish this most irregular season with a 6-1 record and a #7 national ranking – the highest in more than a half century.  Which bowl they will wind up being scheduled to play in is anyone’s guess, but prevailing logic points to the Fiesta Bowl.  The bigger question is whether the Fiesta Bowl and others will be able to be played as scheduled.

It’s been a longstanding dream for tens of thousands of Indiana alums and fans to be able to gather at the site of one of the New Years Day bowls to celebrate the football program’s success.  Even when Indiana has been good, they have fallen short of that goal.  Irony of ironies – as the Hoosiers succeed, their fans will likely be unable to attend.

With vaccine being deployed, we hope the worst is over and our lives are able to return to normal soon.  Clearly, we are a few weeks or months from anything resembling normal.  That Indiana Football is strangely good while the world is strangely unable to enjoy it might be the most logical thing we experience in 2020.

Comparing TV apps AT&T TV, Hulu Live, & YouTube TV – want to watch Pacers game without cable? Here is what you need to do!

Pacers fans (and Cubs fans) have only one choice!

The Indiana Pacers preseason starts in tomorrow night, and games will be carried on Fox Sports Indiana.  If your content provider does not carry FS Indiana, you will not see Pacers games.

That caused me a problem that I corrected Wednesday.  I was a subscriber to Disney-owned Hulu Live TV, but the agreement they had with Fox Sports lapsed, which means no FS Indiana.  So I switched to AT&T TV – a similar non-cable option.

Last summer I flipped from YouTube TV to Hulu because Hulu carried Cubs baseball on the Marquee Network.  My decision to punt Hulu was also helped along by their decision to jack their price to $64.95 per month.  Getting less programming for more cash is a curious business model to which I will not be a party.

So, over this period, I have become a bit of an expert on TV programming services – especially those delivered via wireless internet.  If you are trying to decide whether to pull the plug or not,  I’ll compare and contrast the three primary wireless services below.

Before we get their though, I’ll answer why you should go from traditional cable to app delivered TV.

The nice thing about wireless services is that you don’t need a bunch of cables strung all over your house, and installation is as easy as buying an app.  The downside?  There really isn’t one as long as your modem or wireless connection doesn’t get funky.  You will also need download speeds of 200 mbps of faster for a seamless experience.  Don’t skimp to save a few bucks.  The result will be buffering – an unpleasant freezing of the video while the TV struggles to download the next images.  It can be quite frustrating.  The cost is between $50 – $80 per month, but if you need high speed anyway, it’s not really part of the price of TV.

If you have a smart TV, accessibility is very simple and requires no external box or gadget hooked to your TV – like an Apple TV unit, a Firestick, or Roku dongle.  I have Apple TV boxes because a couple of years ago, smart TVs weren’t as smart as they are now.  The programming is received through an app, just as it is with a smart phone.

The clarity of the picture is impossible for me to distinguish from cable to wireless.  One of the best aspects of the wireless option is the lack of installation by a cable guy.  Download the app, subscribe to the service, watch TV.  It’s that simple, and if you are going to get Fox Sports Indiana by tomorrow, you need simple!

The comparison between the leading wireless providers is a little more complicated.  I have never subscribed to Sling or Fubo, so you will have to seek guidance elsewhere for those.  I can tell you that Fubo is sports-centric and Sling is a budget version for those who don’t watch a lot of TV.

Here they are in alphabetical order – and coincidentally in the order of highest quality to lowest in my opinion:

AT&T TV –

  • More networks – like FS-Indiana and Marquee – although no CBS Sports Network, which I enjoy – especially for the occasional Butler game that is accessed there.
  • Also more networks that cater to a more feminine demographic, but I have very few readers who enjoy OWN and WE, so let’s skip that.
  • Better picture.  Not sure why, but Dolby Video looks better on my TV with AT&T TV – a 65-inch Sony X950H, which is either the highest low-end LED screen or the lowest high-end  TV on the market.
  • More on-demand content.  At least it seems like more on-demand stuff is available.  Maybe it’s the same, but it’s easier to find.  Who wants to search for a movie like a fisherman looks for a record breaking trout?
  • Better interface.  This is a bit of a subjective evaluation depending upon your taste, but I navigate AT&T’s guide more easily than Hulu.  YouTube TV’s programmable guide is cool. guide
  • A bunch of free trials – HBO MAX (one year) and Showtime, Starz, Cinemax, EPIX for three months (set an appointment on your smart phone to cancel before the fees are  automatically charged).
  • No buffering.  Haven’t had video back up 15-seconds, chatter, or do anything to interrupt my viewing enjoyment.  In the middle of a sporting event, buffering is especially problematic.
  • Three TVs can use the service simultaneously, unless you pay an upcharge.
  • Fox Sports & Marquee are on top of the $64.95 monthly fee.  The exact amount of the RSN charge is $8.49/month.
  • Two-year commitment, and after the first year the monthly cost jumps from $64.95 to $110 for the Choice package.  We have all been down this road.  If your account remains in good standing, most providers are willing to extend the promotional price.  The penalty for breaking the contract is $15 per month.
  • $100 Visa Gift Card.  I will use the card to offset more than half the cost of cancellation if AT&T doesn’t play ball in extending the promotional price.
  • Not accessible through PlayStation, but AT&T will ship a receiver at no charge for a TV without the software needed to receive its product.  For more boxes, more money is charged.
  • DVR capacity is 500 hours – or Caddyshack 306.122 times!

Hulu Live TV –

  • Price being bumped from $54.95 to $64.95 per month on December 19th without the addition of any networks.
  • The picture is quite good, although the interface is clunky.
  • There is a recently watched tab that allows you to save a little time to select networks you watch often, but changing the network is still unnecessarily complex.
  • The on-demand content is reasonably deep.
  • Only two TVs can use Hulu simultaneously on two screens unless you pay an upcharge.
  • The price includes a subscription to Hulu, if you like Handmade’s Tale.
  • The commitment is month to month – no contract.
  • If they had not ended their deal with the Fox RSNs and Marquee, I would never have searched for a better option.  Even if they have made FS Indiana and Marquee available ala carte, I would have paid and stayed.
  • 50 hours of DVR without paying extra.  That’s not a lot, but I tend to view recorded programs as responsibilities instead of a convenience, so that wasn’t a big deal for me.

YouTube TV –

  • Lost me when the price went up from $49.95 per month to $64.95 per month because of the addition of CBS networks like MTV, VH1, and Comedy Central – all of which I have lived without quite nicely since 1997.
  • It did not offer Marquee, which meant when baseball resumed, I would not be able to watch the Cubs.  It also ended the deal it had with Fox Sports RSNs.
  • The picture is not as clear, bright, and crisp as either AT&T TV or Hulu.
  • One thing I liked very much was the user interface which allowed me to delete from the guide networks I had no interest in watching.
  • Three TVs can view YouTube TV at the same time.
  • Recording shows is unlimited, but all content is saved a maximum of nine months.

There you have it.  Easy beezy!  Just as when we eliminated our landline phone, the concept of watching TV without a cable seemed odd.  We have since had cable pulled from our house and the drywall repaired.

Enjoy!