by Kent Sterling
“Len” is a friend of mine who emails anti-Tom Crean messages to me with regularity. Having worked with Crean twice per year while toiling for a competing Big East basketball program, he was not – and is not – a fan.
Click here to follow Kent on Twitter
So when he sent a link to a piece posted today on the Wall Street Journal’s “The Count” column. I opened it knowing that “Len” would be trying to continue the ongoing work of making his case against Crean’s continued employment. The subject line removed all guesswork, “Fire Crean Before It’s Too Late.”
I wasn’t surprised by what was in the column, but was a little shocked that it would appear in the Wall Street Journal. Either the author has a similarly skewed view of Crean, or the Journal believes that their is a bounty of Kelley School of Business grads around the country who will lap up any and all IU Basketball perspective, including an arcane occurrence that makes the 2012-2013 Indiana team the biggest underachiever in college basketball history, according to the WSJ.
The graphic from the WSJ above shows all 13 teams in the history of college basketball to have two top five players drafted in the NBA Draft and how they finished in that year’s NCAA Tourney. Only five won the tournament, one was the runner-up, three more lost in the Final Four, one lost in the Elite Eight, and the other three (IU in 2013 among them) lost in the Sweet Sixteen.
The two players who were drafted in the top five for the other two teams to lose in the Sweet Sixteen won a different tournament at some point during their careers.
I like a man willing to take a passionate stand against a successful coach for purely personal reasons as much as the next guy – more probably. And I have liked this person very much since meeting him as a freshman after being told that his name was Larry. I greeted him on the way to the Briscoe Quad’s cafeteria, “Hey, Larry!” He said clearly and loudly, “That’s – not – my – name!” It was friendship at first sight.
But in this limited instance, “Len” is wrong. Here are five great reasons off the top of my head as to why (if I gave it much thought, I could come up with a screed rivaling the length of Martin Luther’s grievances against the Catholic Church):
- Since arriving in Bloomington, Crean’s Hoosiers have won 6, 10, 12, 27, and 29 games.
- Despite losing in the Sweet Sixteen in two consecutive years, the improvement of Victor Oladipo from the 144th ranked high school player in 2010 to the #2 NBA draft pick makes Indiana a destination for recruits serious about improving their games.
- The NCAA’s Academic Progress Rate score for Indiana Basketball has been a perfect 1,000.
- Indiana won the 2013 regular season Big Ten Championship – it’s first unshared title in 20 years.
- The 2013 recruiting class is ranked fourth nationally by ESPN, and the only Big Ten program in the top ten.
There is no doubt a disconnect exists between the IU grads who matriculated (I haven’t matriculated in years!) during the Bob Knight era. The offense Indiana runs looks nothing like the rhythmic and effective motion offense of Knight’s. The relentless ball screens make some of the older IU fans wince.
A personal disconnect is there on some level too, but the work IU basketball players do in the classroom and on the court is exemplary, and that’s the criteria by which Crean should be judged.
It’s impossible for a coach to win NCAA Tournaments without some luck, and Indiana (with a bad early pairing against eventual champ Kentucky in 2012, and one poor performance against Syracuse) haven’t had much.
There is certainly room to be critical of Crean as it appears he tries to coach Indiana players into peaking physically and mentally through the entire season. The Hoosiers appeared to run out of gas late last season – notably in the second half against Ohio State on March 5th and beyond. Slowing feet late in the season makes winning tough. I would love to see Crean back off the minutes of his starters during the pre-Big Ten season, and clear the bench a little earlier during blowouts, but that’s Monday morning quarterbacking after seeing the result of the extended minutes.
Crean has gotten to the pinnacle of his profession through relentless hard work. To expect a coach with that professional background to back off the throttle at any point is not reasonable.
No coach is without warts, but Crean’s IU program is clean, graduates all players, wins at a high level, and recruits with Duke, Kentucky, and Kansas. That makes a great and correct answer to the question – who should coach basketball at Indiana University?
I love the emails, but Crean has succeeded where few others might have.
You took the Crean angle; I will take the underachieving teams angle. North Carolina in ’84 was MUCH more a disappointment than last year’s Hoosier squad:
That year North Carolina lost in the East Regional to IU. North Carolina went into the tournament ranked No 1 with a 28-2 record. They had Michael Jordan, Sam Perkins, Kenny Smith, Brad Daugherty and Joe Wolf — ALL FIRST ROUND PICKS!
Indiana had eight losses and a relatively unknown team. Only two players, Steve Alford and Uwe Blab, would scarcely even see the NBA.
My friend took the Crean angle, which I debated. Indiana also had the great Dan Dakich and Winston Morgan, not to mention the always turning wheels of Bob Knight, who was never better than in preparing for teams who were supposed to beat Indiana.
People tend to make snap judgments about coaches and people of the opposite sex. It isn’t prudent in either case.
Statistics are for losers (except those used by the Wall Street Journal).
86% of Boilermakers agree with that statement 43% of the time.
Your five facts are all correct but have nothing to do with whether the Hoosiers underachieved this past season in the NCAA tournament, which was the point of Ben Cohen’s article. I don’t know how anyone could argue that IU grossly underachieved as a #1 seed, with the success and talent they had this last season.
It’s great to see IU basketball back but let’s not give CTC credit for being a great coach until his teams overachieve on the floor. That is the mark of a great coach/leader…the ability to take talent and achieve results beyond what that talent “should” have been capable of individually. I don’t see that yet in CTC. In the interim, annual Sweet 16 appearances will be more than welcomed by the IU faithful.
Sorry for stepping in (well, a little sorry), but if the whole point of Cohen’s article is that IU underachieved, then that isn’t really worthy of an article. Every year coaches and teams underachieve. That was the point of my ’84 NC (Dean Smith) comparison. Why would singling Crean out for that – especially this early in his IU career have any value?
I don’t know that Cohen’s article meant to single out Crean as much as he just listed this team as one of the biggest underachievers of all time, and with that you tend to look at the coach, right or wrong. I agree with you that teams/coaches underachieve every year. Cohen just made the point that IU in 2012-13 was in the select category of underachievers with two top 5 NBA picks. You can certainly argue that IU isn’t the ‘worst’ underachiever but they are at least near the top of the list being one of only three teams with two top 5 picks that didn’t get past the Sweet 16. Personally I am not a fan of Crean as a coach. However, he is an awesome recruiter and I assume he does a great job with fundraising. I suspect that recruiting and fundraising are every bit as important for a big-time college coach, if not more so than ability to outfox your fellow coaches. So, if that makes Crean a winner with the IU faithful that is all that matters. I am an IU fan, not an IU grad so I can say I haven’t drunk the kool-aid (at least not as much as some others).
I think I feel mostly as you do. I am an IU grad, but I certainly am not sold on Crean’s in-game coaching strategies, nor his offensive system. He is a great recruiter and by most accounts a fine man. I am trying to hold out for at least a couple of more years before I write him off as a guy that can’t go to the next level.
Way too much emphasis is put on tournament results. They lost one important game. It happens. They also won the first outright big ten championship in 20 years. You know what team really underachieved last year: Kentucky.