by Kent Sterling
Just because the Indiana Hoosiers season ended in disappointment with the Big Ten Tourney loss to Illinois, the news doesn’t stop rolling out of Bloomington.
Senior Will Sheehey will play in the Reese’s D-1 All-Star Game at Cowboys Stadium. If you are planning to attend the game in person, ignore the TV listing. The game will be played Friday at 4:30p, and telecast on CBS on tape delay at Noon Saturday. The Big Ten will also be represented by Drew Crawford of Northwestern.
Four Hoosiers earned four spots on the Big Ten’s 2013-14 Academic All-Conference team. Seniors Jeff Howard and Taylor Wayer, and sophomores Jonny Marlin and Peter Jurkin were honored.
Click here to follow Kent on Twitter
The list of honored student-athletes features 34 men’s basketball players from the 12 member schools. To be eligible for Academic All-Big Ten selection, student-athletes must be letterwinners who are in at least their second academic year at their institution and carry a cumulative grade-point average of 3.0 or higher.
“Marni Mooney deserves the bulk of the credit for keeping our guys on task daily,” said coach Tom Crean. “When you measure our APR, record of graduating players and the academic awards and honors our players have received recently, we believe we are as strong in this area as anyone in the country.”
Other Hoosiers who have earned this distinction at least once in the last five years include Cody Zeller, Victor Oladipo, Jordan Hulls, Derek Elston, Matt Roth, Daniel Moore, Kory Barnett, Tom Pritchard, Brett Finkelmeier, and Tijan Jobe.
During Crean’s tenure, 21 players will have completed their degree requirements by this summer, and five have gone on to leave with master’s degrees. Last summer, the NCAA recognized the IU men’s basketball program with an APR Public Recognition Award, which is given to high-performing teams that posted multiyear APRs in the top 10 percent of all squads in their particular sports. The Academic Progress Rate is a real-time measure of eligibility and retention of student-athletes competing on every Division I sports team. IU had a perfect score of 1,000.
I debated for several days whether I should write about a rumor I heard from two sources about the possibility of the Indiana coaching staff asking a current player in good academic standing to relinquish his scholarship. Dealing in rumors is not something I engage in. Everyone believes they know something, and many times rumors proffered by sources close to a program have no basis in fact.
Hell, some of the facts from those who actually do know things are a significant distance from the truth. So what was the difference this time? Why would I mention the rumor?
I decided to write the post (click here to read it) because to force a kid out of a program prior to earned his degree without some kind of insubordination is wrong – really wrong – and I don’t want Indiana or any other program to go there. Not a lot of good happened on the court this year, but that doesn’t mean the ugliness should extend to a win-at-all-costs act brought to bear on a student-athlete. And I don’t use the term ‘student-athlete’ as a default description of athletes attending college.
Indiana University portrays itself as a place where athletics feed the educational experience of students who compete for the Hoosiers 24 NCAA teams. That makes the disconnect between the NCAA’s rules on compensation and the value of the work being done by athletes a little less out of whack. If the players get a valuable education and degree in exchange for their athletic work, at least they leave with something.
If a player is stripped of his scholarship because the coaching staff needs it to recruit another player to improve the on-court product, that is in opposition to the mission of collegiate athletics. If a kid is recruited, signed, and does all he is asked in workouts, practice, and in the classroom, he should be allowed to continue to work toward his degree.
Click here to get your teeth fixed by my dentist – the best dentist – Dr. Mike O’Neil at Today’s Dentistry
I wrote about this in advance of any action being taken because I want people in power to think twice about joining those programs careering down the slippery slope of win-at-all-costs behavior.
The entire issue might be moot as Indiana lost Temple grad transfer Anthony Lee to Ohio State, and late period target Yante Maten is reportedly leaning toward signing with Michigan State. The removal of those two potential Hoosiers may make an additional scholarship unnecessary.
Fans should want Indiana to win, but win the right way. Mistakes are made by the best recruiters, but those mistakes should not be corrected at the expense of a kid who has done nothing wrong but not be as good as an incoming freshman might be.
I would rather write something on the front end to raise issues that might resonate with decision makers than wait until the deed is done to cry foul. Journalistically, writing about a rumor was not a call that I wouldn’t applaud, but as a human being I’m fine with it.
Kent: This is pretty iffy…. You accused the staff of something you declared immoral without names or sources, and, when that nefarious act doesn’t occur, you seem to be saying it was prevented by your unsubstantiated accusation. At the same time you leave the stain of your accusation open against the staff. You’ve done much better work.
Agree with Tom Cobb. Blogging obviously is the same as reporting, but there are a lot of good reasons why no other media source would have touched a story like the rumored transfer.
I also thought this line from the original article,”but the fallout for another transfer will be far less tolerant than was the case a week ago when five players left” was borderline misleading within the context of the rest of the article.
And, I’m pretty sure it’s very common for a walk-on to leave the team at all colleges everywhere. People who go to the next level and never play sometimes get tired of all the work.
Sorry, first sentence from my comment should have read like “blogging in NOT the same as reporting”.
I would venture to guess that the percentage of walk-ons sticking around is greater than for the scholarship kids. Walk-ons play because they love the game and the work. It’s not for the fleeting moments on the court. Scholarship kids all believe when they enroll that the NBA is in their future. Some roll out to where the chances to show their wares is greatest. No data on that, and I could be wrong, but the walk-ons I have known are validated through helping the team prepare. They are mostly a very resilient group.
What I meant by ”but the fallout for another transfer will be far less tolerant than was the case a week ago when five players left” was that I am willing to accept the rationale provide by Indiana press releases for Vonleh, Etherington, Hollowell, Marlin, and Fagan. If another goes – specifically the player I have heard may be fired – I am done buying the company line and IU Basketball will have crossed a line that cannot be forgiven, at least by me.
The reason I wrote about this was to do what little I could to discourage the practice of firing scholarship athletes prior to their earning a degree, or minus a very good reason (legal issues, insubordination, etc…). If a player was fired without cause, and I sat on it and then raged against the machine, that would have been chicken shit.
Chicken shit/journalistic correctitude vs. standing up/posting based upon rumor is an easy battle in my mind.
It’s the first time I have crossed this line, and hopefully there won’t be a second.
Crimson Quarry crunched the numbers on IU transfers under Crean and they are something like .1 percent higher than the average of every other big ten coach during the same time.
I may not like this article, but I do like your style Kent. Not too many media guys around Indy who offer strong opinions that are against the grain.
Sadly, against the grain is my middle name. Spent a lifetime fruitlessly trying to go with the grain. Now I ride the crest of this wave of unpopularity.
Thanks for reading and commenting.
I agree. It hasn’t not happened yet, and nothing has been prevented. And I didn’t accuse anyone – I mentioned the rumor that prompted my post, and hope it’s entirely the result of an active imagination or misunderstanding. I did not report the source because it’s not important.
Definitely a decision that can be be questioned, and frankly the explanation did sound a little self-congratulatory, which was not my intent.
A good Christian Man like Crean would never do anything like that.
I debated over several months whether I should write about a rumor I heard from two sources that you’re a closet UK and Coach Calipari fan. Dealing in rumors is not something I engage in, but in this case, I’ll make an exception.
Why would I mention said rumor?
Well, I decided to do so because I heard you were on the verge of putting an article here on your site where you finally gave in to UK and started gushing praise and fawning all over Coach Calipari. Not a lot of good happened on your site this year, but that doesn’t mean you could’ve turned things around by telling the Hoosier faithful : “Sorry, I had it all wrong, good luck, and Go Big Blue!”
So I wrote about this in advance of any action being taken because I want your readers to think twice about joining all of the Anti-UK and Anti-Coach Cal behavior Kent voices on his site. Also because I think it will deter Kent from finally coming out of the closet and telling us how much of a man-crush he has for Calipari, not to mention his lifelong love-affair with UK hoops. It would be just too much for some to take, methinks.
I would rather write something on the front end to raise issues that might resonate with people than wait until the deed is done to cry foul. Journalistically, writing about a rumor was not a call that I wouldn’t applaud, but as a human being I’m fine with it.