Top eight reasons the Trent Richardson trade wasn’t the worst in NFL (or Colts) history

There aren't a lot of smiles in Indianapolis when discussing the Colts trade for Trent Richardson, but there have been worse deals.

There aren’t a lot of smiles in Indianapolis when discussing the Colts trade for Trent Richardson, but there have been worse deals.

Indianapolis Colts general manager Ryan Grigson takes a lot of heat over the 2013 trade for running back Trent Richardson, and rightly so.  The deal was a complete bust.

That’s looking at it through the rearview mirror, which is a luxury afforded to critics.  On the front end, this appeared to be a pretty good deal for the Colts.

Steven Ruiz of the USA Today ranked the 32 NFL GMs in a post yesterday.  Grigson came in 28th overall, and next to last among non-newbies, in large part because of the Richardson trade.

I’m no defender of Grigson because of his liberal and scattershot use of free agents in building the Colts roster, but when the trade was made there were plenty of reasons to believe it was a smart move.

Here are eight reasons to give Grigson a pass on the Richardson deal:

8 – Who knew Richardson would eat his way out of the NFL?  Richardson was fat, and fat running backs have a tough time getting to the hole on time.  He was signed yesterday by the Baltimore Ravens after getting in shape again, but his voracious appetite for fatty foods was not a well-known detriment back in 2013 when Grigson pulled the trigger.

Click here to follow Kent on Twitter

7 – Not even close to the worst trade in Colts history.  How about 1994 when then GM Bill Tobin traded to move up from the seventh overall pick to the fifth to take Trev Alberts?  The San Francisco 49ers used the seventh pick to take Bryant Young – a four-time pro bowler out of Notre Dame.  Maybe the rash of bad moves by Tobin makes criticizing him seem cruel, but if we are going to hammer Grigson over Richardson, delve back into the archives of the Colts franchise prior to Bill Polian’s run of shrewd deals to throw around “worst in history” when discussing Richardson.

6 – Combine measurements showed a borderline freak.  His combination of speed and strength doesn’t come along very often, but Richardson shows the fallacy of buying the hype created in Indianapolis during that pre-draft workout.  His 4.53 time in the 40-yard dash, 37-inch vertical, and 25 reps benching 225 lbs foretold potential greatness.  Too bad speed in eating multiple breaded tenderloins wasn’t part of the protocol.

5 – Trent was a well-rested beast at Alabama.   After starting only two games during his first two seasons for Nick Saban, Richardson became a very productive bell cow during his final season for the Crimson Tide.  He averaged 129.2 yards per game and scored 21 touchdowns.  He was also a mildly productive receiver out of the backfield with 29 catches for 338 yards and another three TDs.

4 – The Colts got a year worth of Richardson before the draft ever took place.  At the time of the trade, the Colts were in dire need of a running back to take pressure off second year sensation Andrew Luck.  Vick Ballard went down, and Grigson stepped up.  Sacrificing nothing from the current team, he made the deal to chase a championship with a player whose appetite for fatty foods was at that point unknown.  Trading for Richardson was a bit like buying a house with the first year of mortgages paid by the previous owner.

3 – The Colts got the better end of this deal.  The Browns took the 26th overall they netted for Richardson, packaged it with a third rounder, and traded up from 26 to 22 so they could take Johnny Manziel.  You want to talk about a terrible trade – or two – how about the network of trades the Browns made to acquire Manziel.  There aren’t many football players you would rather have than Manziel, but Richardson is just inside that window.  And the Browns not only dealt Richardson for the 26th pick, they dealt the 26th pick to the Eagles along with a third rounder to move up to grab Johnny Cuttysark.  For the record, the Eagles got bupkis out of their bounty from that deal.  To castigate Grigson for making a terrible trade when the partner got even less out of it is silly.

2 – Richardson ran for 950 yards as a rookie.  There was no reason to believe Richardson wouldn’t be able to find holes created by defenses worried about Luck, Reggie Wayne, and T.Y. Hilton shredding them.  The Browns had no such threat, so why wouldn’t Richardson be able to at least match his productivity enjoyed at the factory of sadness in Cleveland?

Click here for a $1 comprehensive dental exam done by the best dentist in Indiana – Dr. Mike O’Neil at Today’s Dentistry

1 – Dominique Easley.  Four picks after the pick the Colts sent to the Browns, the Patriots drafted Easley, a defensive tackle out of Florida.  A week ago, Bill Belichick cut him.  is anyone attacking Belichick for blowing the 30th pick of the 2014 draft on a bust?  Of course not.  At least the Colts got a potentially solid running back for the 26th overall pick.  Belichick got nothing.

There are plenty of valid criticisms of Grigson, but the Richardson trade isn’t one of them.

Kent Sterling hosts the fastest growing sportstalk show in Indianapolis on CBS Sports 1430 every weekday from 3p-6p, and writes about Indiana sports at

One thought on “Top eight reasons the Trent Richardson trade wasn’t the worst in NFL (or Colts) history

  1. joel

    At the time , maybe, Grigson made the right move for Richardson, it looked good given his college history and his rookie season.

    The only reason the Colts got the better end of the deal is because of the bad moves by Cleveland and Philly.
    Who knows what the Colts would have done if they hung on to that pick. Five offensive lineman went in the 1st round. RG should have known better and even from the beginning to protect his QB. You can get a decent running back in later rounds, especially when you need to solidify the line. They are not at a premium anymore. For god sakes, Grigson played offensive line!!!

    Yes at the time it might have been a good move, but did the Colts REALLY need to waste a pick on a RB(not at a premium anymore) and where the league is more pass orientated and with a QB like Andrew?
    This man was given the reigns to build a team ,and when you have a prize asset , you protect them. No brainer.
    Dan Dakich is a Grigson apologist.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *